Using a film scanner to its full performance is a black art that (unfortunately) cannot be learned overnight or even within a couple months. I know this is a powerhouse of a scanner, so I'm wondering if this is user error. Note: I have played with the stock Nikon Scan 4, but the scans aren't yielding a lot of crisp information, and using unsharp mask just seems like putting a band aid over a potentially bigger issue (not great scans). Could someone please help this newbie out? I have used VueScan for scanning works on paper and it works great, but I don't mind spending the extra money on Silverfast 6 if the software will save appreciable time and/or produce superior scans/image correction. The priority is capturing as much crisp information from these older transparencies as possible and saving time with a good built-in color correction/dust and scratch removal, as I will be scanning a large collection and won't have the time to do major edits in PS. I have found many resources comparing VueScan to Silverfast, but between wading through opinions and trying to figure out which features need prioritizing, my brain is about to liquify out of my ears. (Note: I would need to use Silverfast 6, as this is the last version that supports PowerMac/10.4). I have a Nikon Super CoolScan 9000 ED on a PowerMac G5 running 10.4. late 1970s transparency slides for a book project. I am brand new to archiving film and will be scanning a collection of approx.
0 kommentar(er)
